Wednesday, June 19, 2019

An analysis of farmers attitudes towards conflicting land use activities in the Okavango Delta

Mogomotsi, P.K. (PhD)*, Phonchi-Tshekiso N.D, & Hambira W.L. (PhD)
Okavango Research Institute, University of Botswana. Private Bag 285, Maun, Botswana *Corresponding author: finkymadigele@gmail.com & pmadigele@ub.ac.bw

Theme: Human-Wildlife Conflict Management Best Practices; Animal Overpopulation, Crop Destruction, Domestic Animals Preying, Infrastructure Development & Human Settlement.

 Abstract
The utilization of the Okavango Delta has over the years shifted from communal use to state control, with increased use for conservation and tourism. This has consequently resulted in changing demands in land-use from traditional land uses comprising mainly subsistence agriculture to contemporary modern land uses within the Delta. Therefore, the objectives informing this paper are to analyze farmers’ attitudes towards land use conflict arising from agriculture and tourism activities; determine farmers’ attitudes towards wildlife and protected areas; and explore farmers’ perspectives towards the development of tourism and Community Based Natural Resources Management (CBNRM) within their communities. Empirical survey methods including household survey, key informant interviews and focus group discussions were implored to address the aforementioned objectives. The results revealed that farmers generally perceive rural development to be more important than wildlife conservation. They allege that the development of the tourism industry in the Okavango Delta is given priority over farming and their other livelihood activities. The farmers also perceive the development of CBNRM in their communities as crucial. CBNRM provides a potential solution for the communities’ negative attitudes towards tourism and conservation. The paper concludes that indeed there exist conflicts between contemporary and traditional land uses in the Okavango Delta and therefore makes a clarion call to land-use institutions to provide viable, effective and affordable options from addressing land-use conflicts.

No comments: